Supernatural is the little horror show that beat the odds.
​
Fifteen years ago a vaguely titled show about two brothers hunting monsters debuted on the WB. The actors playing Sam and Dean Winchester—Jensen Ackles and Jared Padalecki—weren’t household names. The show’s creator, Eric Kripke, had been unsuccessfully shopping his idea about paranormal crime fighters for a decade.

hen Supernatural first aired on Sept. 13, 2005, everyone’s expectations were modest. Critics said it was “kinda like Buffy, only with boys.” Padalecki can still remember the exact pitch for the first season: “Route 66 meets X-Files, brothers on the back roads of America hunting things that go bump in the night.”

Still, encouraged by promising early ratings, WB executives stuck by the scrappy, relatively low-budget original show even as the network itself went through the upheaval of evolving into the CW.

Kripke set up his weekly horror flick pilot with a flashback to the fiery death of Sam and Dean’s mother, Mary (Samantha Smith), at the hands of the yellow-eyed demon Azazel (Frederick Lehne). Flashing forward 22 years later, and the widowed John Winchester (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) and his older son, Dean, spend their time hunting, yes, demons. 

When Azazel strikes again, ordering the slaughter of younger son Sam’s girlfriend (Adrianne Palicki), Sam opts to drop out of college, skip law school and join the family business as well.

Padalecki says he became interested in the role because he like horror series, but he was even more excited to become “the reluctant hero.” In his eyes, “Sam is something like The Matrix’s Neo or Luke Skywalker of Star Wars.” Tragic circumstances force Sam to make the big choices that shape his life.

Throughout the first several seasons, Supernatural delivered on its original premise of scares, gore and tears—and plenty of cliff-hangers—as research-minded Sam and his gruff, cheeseburger-loving older brother, Dean, battled every variety of monster and demon. Finding their father, who disappeared in the first episode (“Dad’s on a hunting trip and he hasn’t been home for a few days.”) was the boys’ goal in season 1, although that ended up being as difficult as getting John to stick around once he was finally discovered.

As a paranormal writer myself, I had great fun researching creatures and spells along with the Winchester brothers. I was impressed that the lore the writers referenced was accurate. In fact, writer Eric Kripke used to say, “Is it a Google-able monster?” In the first season, we learned how to kill demons, vampires and ghosts along with the brothers.

The show’s formula during that year was simple: Include at least on scene set in the brothers’ 1967 Impala, weave a plotline about a growing threat, and plant plenty of callbacks to the deep mythology developed in previous episodes.

​Oh, Baby!

​Baby, the Impala, was Sam and Dean’s only home for many years, along with cheap motel rooms they often paid for with forged, stolen or found credit cards. The iconic car (nine different vehicles were used in the series, one of which squealed and creaked horribly every time they opened a door. 

Baby meant so much to the stars, in fact, that they both now have ’67 Impalas parked at their Texas homes, part of their final contract.

“Having a car that was like the third lead of the show was important to me,” Kripke says. “When I told my neighbor in Venice (California), who was a mechanic, that I wanted a badass car and was thinking of a ’65 Mustang, he said, “Yeah, a Mustang is the perfect car if you’re p**sy.” And without missing a beat, he said, “You want a ’67 Impala because you can put a body in that trunk.”
​
Dean had an extremely limited musical library of 8-tracks in the car. He played those songs a LOT, much to Sam’s dismay. In one scene Sam described them as the “greatest hits of the mullet rock era.” But the music has become a huge part of the series’ appeal: Carry On My Wayward Son (1976 Kansas jam) is basically the show’s theme song.

And Ackles’ extra reel 
​of Dean lip syncing and playing air guitar on Baby to “Eye of the Tiger” (Survivor) in Season 4 is a gem fans enjoy watching again and again. 

The Winchester family reunion was short-lived: Season 1 closed with a car crash and the fates of all three men up in the air. When the story picks up, John Winchester makes a deal with the demon Azazel, trading his life for Dean’s.

“Everything up to that point was about finding Dad,” Jensen Ackles said.

“I think that was the first time we saw a major character die and come back. It was a total leap of faith,” Padalecki continued. 

But they weren’t surprised. Right after the show moved to Vancouver to film, Kripke had pulled the two actors aside and said, “I could write monsters or days, but this show begins and ends with family, and the relationship these brothers have.”

“So, after our dad’s sacrifice,” Padalecki said, “we told the story of Reapers and the veil, and what happens to your soul. And we got into afterlife. The introduction of Hell and making deals with demons was a big shift in what Supernatural could do.”

Ackles added, “Which is funny, because when you think about it now, Eric (Kripke) must’ve always known because Mom made a deal with the yellow-eyed demon too.”

Angel Castiel
As the show evolved, so did the monsters, and in season 4, the introduction of angels changed everything once again. “I was concerned that would be a bridge too far,” Padalecki says of the angelic decision. “I wondered, ’Are we going to turn off a lot of the people that came here to watch a scary movie?”

Show creator Kripke himself had fought the idea for years, until he had an epiphany while he was washing his face. “I realized the supernatural world was unbalanced,” he said. “There was only evil. So I walked in the writers’ room on day one of season 4 and said, ‘Okay, there’s going to be angels…but they’re dicks!’” As Kripke puts it, “Angels completed the mythology.” They also added Misha Collins (brilliant move!) to the cast as Castiel, the first angel of the lord and the closest thing to a third Winchester brother.
​
“And now, amazingly, 11 years later,” Collins says, “so much of the show has been hung on biblical lore and mythology that is actually drawn from the Bible. Along the way, we’ve talked with priests and pastors and ministers, even nuns, who love the show.”

Season 5 brought another of my favorite characters, the wily crossroads demon Crowley (Mark A. Sheppard), later the King of Hell. He served as the Winchesters’ frenemy in more than 70 episodes over eight years.

When fans were asked to vote for the “baddie you most love to hate,” who was surprised? After all, Crowley was the only villain who had a hellhound as a pet.

The Witch We Love

​A few years after, in Season 8, another of my favorite characters was introduced, Rowena (Ruth Connell), Crowley’s mother, a powerful and equally amoral witch.
 
Rowena was initially antagonistic toward the Winchesters as she saw Crowley’s relationship with them as diminishing his power. Over time, she became an ally, particularly with Sam, although she was destined to die by his hand, when she chose to sacrifice herself and save the world by using her own body to imprison all the souls and demons and cast them back into Hell. Her soul then took up the empty position of Queen of Hell. To me, that was one area of mythology that the show should have mined more deeply, but didn’t.

Despite Supernatural’s deft ability to keep monster stories fresh while still delivering a record-breaking run as the longest running sci-fi genre series in the history of broadcast television, it wasn’t always a “sure thing” when it came to renewals. “I would honestly say every year up until season 6 or 7 (we were worried),” Ackles says.

What has saved the show is its fans. Supernatural has a very vocal fan base that attends ComiCon-like conventions all over the world. Because of the fans, the show has persevered through three network presidents, five showrunners, a writers’ strike, and six different time slots. Turns out the Winchesters really can survive anything, from the apocalypse to a Friday night time slot. 

By its 12th season it had become the network’s longest-running series. It kept the same two leads, who basically grew up grew up on the show (Padalecki was 23 when he started on the show; Ackles was 27). 

All-Time Favorite Moments
Trying to narrow down their 15-season run to one favorite moment on or off screen was not easy for either actor. 

But Jared Padaleck has a great default answer: Meeting his wife, Genevieve (who recurred as the demon Ruby), in Season 4.
“That season was magical all around. I loved Sam’s storyline that season. The weather was better than normal. But that entire year is colored by my memory of falling in love.”

Then he adds, “But I will say, knowing what I know now, the series finale is my favorite single episode of all time.”

Ackles also pointed to the last episode, and one moment in particular that might take “the number one spot of all time.” For offscreen, he named their final appearance at ComicCon. “There’s something special about that room and that crowd, the grandeur of it all.”

Misha Collins pointed to the “bookends” scenes for angel Castiel. “His introduction on the show was epic,” he said, using similar words to describe his final “Goodbye, I love you,” scene with Dean, ending with a bloody handprint on Dean’s shoulder, just like the one Castiel left when he pulled Dean out of hell back in season four.

One episode of Supernatural remains (a 2-hour special and series finale this Thursday, November 19). It’s titled “Carry On” but neither the synopsis, which reads, “Baby, it’s the final ride for saving people and hunting things,” nor the promo photos reveal much, other than a shot of Dean enjoying some pie.

The original series creator, Eric Kripke weighed in with a message. “The good that has come out of Supernatural is the thing I am most proud of. I know that the Supernatural family will always be there, so I know this isn’t goodbye.”

But for the stars of Supernatural, any further reunions will have to wait a while.

Jensen Ackles is staying on with the CW station, joining the show The Boys for Season 3 as Soldier Boy, the original superhero. The Boys portrays a world in which superheroes exist, but they’re quite dangerous to non-supers, and cause a lot of collateral damage.

The Boys will reunite Ackles with Supernatural creator Eric Kripke, who’s the showrunner on the Amazon series. 

It looks like Ackles’ playlist will also change with this role. Since Soldier Boy was introduced in the World War II era, he’ll be listening to ‘40s big band and swing to get into the part.  

Jensen and his wife, actress and philanthropist Danneel Ackles, have also announced a big joint project, launching their own production company, called Chaos Machine Productions, in conjunction with Warner Bros. Television.

Jensen already owns and runs a brewery, Family Business Beer Company, in Texas.

Jared Padalecki also has his next gig lined up. 

Jared Padalecki also has his next gig lined up. He’s going to star in CW’s re-imagining of Chuck Norris’ classic series, Walker, Texas Ranger.

The new series, simply titled Walker, will feature Padalecki as Cordell Walker, a widower and father who returns to his home in Austin, TX, after two years undercover, He must reconnect with his children, navigate clashes with his family, and find common ground with his new partner, while growing increasingly suspicious of his wife’s death.  

Padelicki will be joined onscreen by fellow Supernatural alum Mitch Pileggi, who will be playing Padalecki’s father. The series is scheduled to premiere on January 21, 2021. 

See you this Thursday for what I’m sure will be a sad, maybe even tearful, but most excellent farewell!

Saturday morning, the majority of major news organizations called the election for Joe Biden, the president-elect of the United States.

Although Donald Trump has not yet conceded the race, the announcement has effectively brought an end to the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, a race that will undoubtedly be remembered as one of the most tumultuous in the nation’s history.
Biden won the White House because of who he is and who he isn’t. He campaigned consistently for racial equality and common decency to save “the soul of the nation.” According to political experts, the election became a referendum on Trump, an up and down vote on his four years, rather than a choice between him and Biden. About two-thirds of voters said their opinion of Trump, either for or against, drove their choice, according to voting polls.

One of the most pivotal figures who supported Biden’s election bid, Rep. James Clyburn, D-South Carolina, said the candidate still had to offer voters something to believe in.

“I’ve said he’s not the perfect candidate. We’re not comparing him to the Almighty. We’re comparing him to the alternative,” Clyburn told USA TODAY. “We needed somebody who was basically center-left, we need somebody who has a good solid reputation, a person who can bring people together. And we need a real contrast to the bombastic incumbent.”

Clyburn, the third-ranking member of the House and the most powerful Black lawmaker in Congress, gave his endorsement and helped Biden consolidate support. Ultimately, three out of 5 black voters supported Biden.

The coronavirus pandemic changed the nature of the campaign completely. Both parties held conventions largely remotely. Door-to-door canvassing became tougher. Voting was a challenge, so many citizens chose to mail in their ballots in record numbers, despite Trump’s unfounded assertion that mail-in voting was corrupt.

The response to the health crisis became one of the defining contrasts between the two presidential campaigns. Biden remained mostly secluded at his Delaware home and appeared at speeches or rallies where participants wore masks and social distanced. Trump resumed and escalated rallies with large crowds packed closely together, few wearing masks. After Trump and several of his family and cabinet members tested positive, these rallies began to be known as “super spreaders.”

About two-thirds of likely voters approved of Biden’s more cautious approach, according to a USA TODAY poll. But Trump’s super-spreader rallies continued. The man even mocked the few attendees who did mask.

Honestly, the last ten days before the election felt a month long. There were times I felt we were experiencing what it was like to live in a communist country. The propaganda claims, espoused by our country’s leader as unquestionable truth, with no evidence or justification. The threats to any Republican Party member who even hinted disagreement. (Those threats are continuing still, by the way.) I cringed and hunkered down, hiding from the bombardment of vile tweets, political ads and other media. Just get through the election. Just get though the election. Just get through it…

But now, finally, we can collectively breathe a sigh of relief. 

“We must restore the soul of America,”  President-elect Biden told the country at his acceptance speech on Sunday night. “Our nation is shaped by the constant battle between our better angels and our darkest impulses. And what presidents say in this battle matters. It’s time for our better angels to prevail. Tonight, the whole world is watching America. I believe, at our best, America is a beacon for the globe. We will lead not only by the example of our power, but by the power of our example.”

Biden needs to unite a country fractured by the pandemic, economic upheaval, racial tensions and climate challenges. He must rebuild broken relationships and alliances around the glove. He also may need to convince a portion of the country that he actually has won.

Instead of concession, Trump and his most ardent supporters are spoiling for a fight. They’ve collected outside the building here in Phoenix where election workers were counting votes, yelling “Trump won,” and chanting to have votes counted.

They floated non-truths about Sharpie pens ruining ballots, and a whole other carnival of conspiracies, only some of which even related to the election at hand.
Saturday’s projections provided some finality and a break to the tensions.  Like steel bands around my chest popping loose. I could breathe. Easily and fully.

Finally, we know he’ll be out of power, and we can begin to undo the damage. 

One blogger put it this way: “If you’ve ever lived with an abuser, you know that one thing they do is absorb ALL of your attention. They control you by keeping you on pins and needles even when they’re NOT being abusive. You’re not even aware of it until it stops. Until you can wake up in the morning not thinking about how you must try to keep things on an even keel. At some point, you realize what a burden you’ve been living with all this time.”

If the elections of 2020 have demonstrated anything, it is that effective representation and governance requires that every single citizen participate in the process. It requires that we pay attention to policies being put forth, and voice our support or opposition in ways that are legal, concise and thoughtful.

Democracy is a lot like gardening; it requires constant and faithful tending. The neglect and abuse of our system over the past few years is going to require some serious assessment, and then a solid plan on how to move forward.
We can certainly celebrate electing a biracial woman, Kamala Harris, to the nation’s second-highest office for the first time in U.S. History. This is a victory for the principles of inclusiveness and equality.
 
Today we celebrate. Tomorrow? That is up to each of us, and how we choose to participate in the process. Whether or not we hold onto this progress, and continue to build on it.

Despite the temptation to think we have entered a brave new post-Trump world, we are more likely to shuffle back to the position we were in during Barack Obama’s second term as president. A divided Congress is likely to prevent any major legislation from being passed. As with Obama, Mitch McConnell will have every incentive to block Biden’s legislative agenda, thinking that inaction and gridlock will bring rewards to the COP in 2022.

I hope I will have to eat my words on this—the Georgia runoffs for Senate could change everything. But barring those wins, Joe Biden is going to enter the presidency in the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression; a pandemic that has claimed nearly 240 thousand American lives; an ongoing national reckoning on racism and sexism; and four years of catastrophic negligence on climate change. And that’s not even factoring in the 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, a problem Obama didn’t have.

But it’s not all bad: Biden can do a lot to handle the COVID-19 pandemic more effectively, even without legislative support, While another stimulus bill will be necessary to alleviate the coronavirus’s effect on our economy, much of the work of containing and eventually stopping the virus can be accomplished just through embracing international cooperation again, as opposed to the Trump administration’s reckless abandonment of agencies like the World Health Organization.

And when one looks at how often the Trump administration abandoned global collaboration on pressing issues—most notably, again, climate change—there’s comfort in the prospect of simply repairing those relationships. As the French Prime Minister said this week when Biden’s victory was announced, “Welcome back.”

There were many important stories within the story of this election: the powerful rise of the Black women and Black Lives Matter as a political force, the demonstrated strength of our growing Latino community.  Most of all, the amazement that a nation, inundated by a resurging pandemic, still voted in historic numbers.

These results did not convincingly repudiate some troubling divisions in our country. We are still, as a nation, precariously flirting with white supremacy, conspiracy theories, and “alternative facts.” I am still concerned about how culture, and specifically faith, may be weaponized. Many communities, including my pagan organization, remain marginal and easily targeted. There are hopeful signs, yes, but we must remain watchful.

To my personal surprise, the biggest think I feel hopeful about is President-elect Biden himself. He stepped up to this challenge. He’s real. Honest. Not manipulative or narcissistic. He cares—really cares—about us. About ME.

So I’m going to breathe another sigh of relief. Put the dark impulses of the past years aside, and look toward our better angels. I know they’re out there, we just have to coax them out of hiding.

Congratulations Senator Mark Kelly! We turned Arizona blue for you. 

Welcome President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. We look forward to working with you.

My writer friend, Laurie Fagen, has launched a new, twice-monthly, half-hour web series, AZ Creates! It will highlight artists, writers, dancers, musicians, film, theatre or TV creatives, and other artistic people in Arizona.

I was honored to appear as her guest this this month, and talk about my paranormal novel, Song of the Ancients, an appropriate for this Samhain season. The interview airs beginning October 22, and will be available online indefinitely. ​
Here’s a bit of the interview:

Q: What drew you to writing this book?

Sandy: I have loved reading and writing since grade school, and I majored in Journalism in college. But I didn’t start my first novel until I was nearly 50, and it was inspired by Severus Snape in the Harry Potter Series.

He haunted me in book 6, the Half-Blood Prince. Good and evil, yin and yang.
Then…Poof! Done in by a snake without even a decent fight.

So, when I began my own book, Song of the Ancients, I started fiddling with that personality type for my main male character, Nicholas Orenda, a man who is infinitely talented, but flawed. A character who will consider bending any moral code to accomplish his goal.

Is he a villain? No. Can you depend on him unconditionally? Well, you tell me. Have you ever loved a bad boy and been disappointed? Nicholas is Samantha’s nemesis, the one she must overcome and win to her side.

Just like life. Because really, is love ever easy?                                                                      

Q: Is this the first book in a series?

Sandy: Yes. Sedona is the first power site featured in the series. Book 2, tentatively titled Stones of the Ancients, will take readers to the ancient standing stones in Scotland. 

Remember the Standing Stones Claire goes through in Outlander? My husband and I were able to research several sites in Scotland two years ago—including the Callinish Standing Stones, which the Outlander scenes are based on.

We had the opportunity to visit an existing excavation site, Ness of Brodgar, which will also be in the book. Additionaly,  I began researching my Campbell Clan heritage, which I can’t wait to write into the book. Book 2 is going to be personal, and so much fun! 

Please take a look at the AZCreates! Podcasts. If you subscribe, you will be notified automatically when a new episode drops.

I’ve put my book-in-progress on the back burner for the last two weeks, while I get Song of the Ancients re-edited and uploaded to Amazon under my own ownership.

I parted ways with my previous publisher a year ago, but we’re just getting around to making the split final. The good news: It’s given me the opportunity to correct some formatting errors in her original upload which have always driven me crazy. Hyphenated words in the middle of a line, for example. I even got dinged in one review for those, but what can you do. Correct them in the next edition, that’s what!
So, a new, sparkly clean version will be back up on Amazon for the public October 15.

Until then, I could really use your help.
Through October 15, I’ll send you a FREE pre-release ebook   in exchange for an Amazon or Goodreads review.  Just send me your email HERE or on my FACEBOOK page and I’ll shoot you out a copy.

The book synopsis:
Samantha Danroe moves from the Midwest to Sedona to start a new life. Instead, she becomes the prey in an ancient war between good and evil.
Nicholas Orenda is a sixth generation witch, in Sedona tracking the man who is killing off his family. “Three will be sacrificed to the dark,” according to his family prophesy.
Can Samantha defeat a supernatural killer and prevent the third sacrifice? Or will she be the catalyst that opens the gate to the underworld buried in Sedona’s magical red rocks?
If you’re interested in witchcraft and shamanism—or just a dark, spooky tale—you’ll enjoy Song of the Ancients, written by a practicing Wiccan priestess.
It’s the debut novel in the Ancient Magic series.
Now you can get in at the beginning—FOR FREE!
I’m trying to replace the 50 fabulous reviews I received in the original edition.
 
Which brings me to my second request for help:
Did you post an Amazon review of Song of the Ancients when it was released originally? You were so kind then, and I’ve made copies of every review before it disappears. Unfortunately, original reviews do not travel with re-released books on Amazon.

Would you be willing to repost your review for this edition if I send you a copy of your original? Again, all I need is your email here or on my Facebook page.

Thank you for your help!

After this re-release, I’ll be finishing my stand-alone suspense, Crescent Moon Crossing. It will be going out on query to agents and editors by early November.

And that means that I will have this year’s National Novel Writing Month (NaNoWriMo) to work on Book 2 in the Ancient Magic series! I am so excited to rejoin Samantha and Nicholas as they head to London to meet with the Council of Elders, and begin their next supernatural investigation…at the standing stones of Scotland!

Again, thank you so much for your support in my writing journey, including the bumps we’ve all weathered along the way. Your readership means everything to me.

Now, go get your free ebook copy of Song of the Ancients, and get reading!

The weather is finally turning fall-ish here in Northern Arizona. I’ve even slept one night under the down comforter. The dogs are foraging through the dropped leaves like puppies on their evening forest walks, while I have my hands stuffed in my coat sleeves.

But the hummingbirds haven’t migrated south to Mexico yet, and neither have the Monarch butterflies, so I know we’re in the midst of Indian summer, not full blown fall.
​
So, before I leave the book writing posts, and start thinking about Halloween topics, I’d like you to meet the last two important characters in Crescent Moon Crossing, my novel-in-progress

Meet Rumor Vargas - Protagonist

If you read my first book, Song of the Ancients, you will remember Rumor Vargas as Samantha Danroe’s business partner at their antique clothing store in Sedona, AZ.  
 
Rumor was that friend who would drag you to parties and events, while you grumbled all the way. The one who would make you dress in costume, even if costumes weren’t specified on the invitation. We all have one of those friends, right? Who is yours? My current one is Barbie G.

Renaissance Festival full attire despite the 100-degree temps. Ritual without a robe and long black dress? Are you kidding? Our latest costume opportunity was my favorite: Phoenix Symphony performing Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. I sat scrunched into the seat next to Barbie’s hoop skirted-theme dress and petticoats—and loved every minute of it.
 
So, Rumor was that kind of friend in my first book. But after her pal Samantha took off for London at the end of that book, with no intention of returning to Arizona, they sold off their store and Rumor moved south to Bisbee, another quirky Arizona town near the Mexico border.
 
In Crescent Moon Crossing, Rumor has again demonstrated her entrepreneurial acumen by opening an antiques store in Bisbee, specializing in folk art, occult pieces and yes, vintage clothing.
 
She has also earned her private pilot license and travels during the summer, acquiring antiques from around the world. If you’ve ever been to Bisbee, by the way, you know how well this eclectic store would fit in in there in real life!
 
Rumor, now 32, is American but has her Mexican father's olive skin, dark hair and eyebrows.  She is bi-lingual and often volunteers at a local refugee shelter called Hope House. By the end of the book, she also decides to advocate in court for illegals fighting to come in the United States and stay here legally.
 
Rumor's friend Abby has been murdered, and Rumor is a partial witness. She wants to help the sheriff find the murderer, and also clear her half-brother, who is a suspect.

Alberto used to be a coyote—a human trafficker for a Mexican cartel. Due to a regrettable act in his past, he owes a debt to the Cartel, which he is still paying back, now by smuggling other contraband into the states. He’s in over his head, and desperately wants out from under the Cartel’s thumb, but he’s worried they will harm his uncle and nephew if he refuses to work anymore for them.
 
In the book, we learn about human smuggling into the United States from Mexico and Central America—a hot political topic at the moment.

During one smuggling trip across the Arizona desert, Alberto’s group encounters what is known as a “Cherry Tree” or “Rape Tree.” Often these trees are strewn with women’s garments as a warning to stay out of a certain Cartel’s traffic territory. These trees are seen on major smuggling routes between Arizona and Mexico.
 
A coyote will make $3,000 to $4,000 a head on Mexican illegals and up to $10,000 for Central American fares. He will bring a few to a dozen people per trip, and may make a trip a month or more.
 
But these rape tree warnings are more likely left by Cartel members, like Alberto, marking their drug smuggling routes. That’s where the big business comes in. An official estimated that cartels send a stunning $60 billion worth of drugs into the U.S. every year. Mexico’s former Public Safety Secretary Genaro Garcia Luna dropped that number at a conference in Juarez a couple of years ago.
 
Will a border wall stem that drug flow? I don’t know. Statistics show that most of the drug smuggling happens other places, like the actual legal border checkpoints. So it feels like the wall will kill off the normal migration routes of local wildlife, rather than kill off the drug trade. There’s just So. Much. Money.
 
The Cartel tie-in does make for some great conflict in the book. First, Rumor is estranged from her father’s side of the family, and vehemently against Alberto’s involvement with the Cartel. Her father isn’t happy about it either, but he’s supporting Alberto’s efforts to get out from under his employer’s hold, and he’s cut ties with Rumor for fear that she will turn her brother over to ICE if he visits the states.
 
Since Sheriff Jones’ wife was killed by a junkie, he also has some wound-related reasons to be suspect Rumor’s brother in this murder investigation. This sets up some interesting conflict for Coop. Can he be unbiased in his murder investigation with Alberto, a drug trafficker, as one of his suspects?
 
I’m approaching 65,000 words, and my goal is to have the rough draft finished before November 1. I would so love to have this one in the can, and begin National Novel Writing Month (NaNo) with a NEW novel to write. Keep your fingers crossed!

#Amwriting  

I’ve been writing a suspense novel, tentatively titled Crescent Moon Crossing, for nearly two years now.  That’s a big chunk of time to devote to a single project, but my first novel, Song of the Ancients, took just as long.  They’re both set in Arizona--Ancients involved the Sedona vortexes, and Crescent Moon Crossing takes place near the Mexico border around Ft.  Huachuca and Bisbee.

I enjoy writing stories set in Arizona. The landscape has such variation, and the cultural mix is diverse. If you want to write paranormal, there’s a lot of spiritual lore and beliefs to draw on to make the world you create believable. If you’re interested in cowboys, horses, desert or ranch life, you’re definitely in the heart of things here. Or, you can go a completely different direction, and include border issues, drug smuggling and Cartel danger. That’s what I did for Crescent Moon Crossing.

Book Teaser:

Staff Sgt. Jace Merrick has two short-term goals: Join Army Intelligence, and kill his wife.

When his bleeding-heart spouse, Abby, begins volunteering at Hope House, a group that leaves supplies in the Arizona desert for illegals crossing the  border, he hatches a plan to make her murder look like a coyote smuggling operation gone wrong.
But someone beats him to it. Someone who has a grudge against Jace Merrick.
You met these two villains in my last two previous blogs.
Now it’s time to meet the good guys.  

Meet main character, Sheriff Cooper (“Coop”) Jones
Coop is a widower with a young daughter, Sadie (you’ll also meet her in the book). His wife was killed by a junkie in a home invasion while Coop was with the Miami police force.
 
After he buries his wife, Coop decides to get as far away from Miami as possible. 
 
He is now the acting Sheriff of Cochise County, AZ, through a circuitous set of events.  The police chief he worked for in Florida met the Maricopa County Sheriff at a national conference, and recommended Coop for a job in Arizona if anything came open. When the Sheriff of Cochise County was killed in a traffic accident, Coop got the call.
 
He’s had only been in Arizona a few months when he has to investigate the murder of a woman, Abby Merrick, in a remote stretch of desert outside Sierra Vista.
 
It looks like she may have stumbled on some Mexican Cartel members smuggling drugs or human cargo across the border. He initially suspects a young Hispanic man who has Cartel ties, and also happens to be the younger brother of Rumor Vargas, a well-respected antiques dealer and business owner in nearby Bisbee.
 
On the other hand, Abby’s Army husband, Jace, also has a pretty strong motive to kill his wife. He’s in the middle of a long-term affair with a lanky blond Lieutenant with a highly connected daddy.
But the more Coop digs into Abby’s death, the more things don’t quite add up for either of these suspects.
Someone else has a grudge against Sgt. Jace Merrick. A life and death grudge. 

​Coop is fast becoming a favorite character of mine. When I first started writing him, I put the Sheriff’s personality characteristics through the Myer Briggs personality tests (as part of a writing class I was taking). He came back as an INTJ (Introverted-Intuitive-Thinking-Judging), an interesting character type. Kind of a loner.
 
To outsiders, INTJs may see to project an aura of “definiteness” and self-confidence. Sometimes mistaken for arrogance by the less decisive, its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise—and INTJs can have several—they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don’t know. 
​
My choice of actor to play Coop (hey, I can dream), is soon-to-be-Walker Texas Ranger Jared Padalecki. He's leaving a 15-season stint as youngest brother Sam Winchester in Supernatural.  If I had to guess, I'm thinking he's an INTJ in real life. 

Another favorite is Luke Grimes. He plays youngest son Kayce  on the outstanding TV western, Yellowstone.

​Whatever they happen to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause, and both perfectionism and purposeful disregard for authority may come into play.
 
These personality traits should make an interesting sheriff, don’t you think? If you’ve ever watched the Western crime suspense series Longmire on Netflix, you’ve already met an INTJ lawman, and he’s a doozy of an example. 

​Longmire features Sheriff Walt Longmire (Aussie actor Robert Taylor), who grapples with a hazy past, complicated moral decisions, and the bad guys of modern Wyoming. 
             
Like Cooper Jones, Sheriff Longmire is also recently widowed. Both characters are men in psychic repair. They bury their pain behind a brave face and meticulous thinking. And both men have a deep understanding and respect for their environment and its indigenous people.

I hope you will come to like Sheriff Coop Jones as much as I’ve enjoyed writing him.

 Meanwhile, as I’m working feverishly to this book, take a look at Longmire and Yellowstone, and let me know what you think of their true-to-life western actors.

My writing week took a strange turn this week.

I’ve been plotting to have my bad guy murder two women camping in the Cochise Stronghold Campground near Tombstone. The first woman I patterned after someone I don’t much care for (there are so many perks to being a novelist!) She’s bossy, so the bad guy decided to kill her first. He slit her throat when she visited the latrine before bed and then pushed her into the self-composting toilet.

 My husband suggested strangling the second girl and stuffing her in the “bear box” at their campsite, but I wasn’t sure she’d fit without cutting her up. Those boxes are kinda small, and I didn’t want my killer to have the deal with a hacksaw and all that blood. (My son said the hacksaw would work better than a chainsaw—more precise and less messy.) But still, who travels with a hacksaw?  So I countered with rubbing her body with the morning breakfast’s bacon grease, and leaving her out as a treat for the bears.
​
Ultimately, I decided the whole “two young women camping alone” scene was cliché, and scrapped all 3,000-plus words. But, damn! It was fun to write. And I’m keeping the scene…who knows, maybe you’ll read it as a short story when I submit it to some horror magazine.   

While we’re on the subject of bad guys, I’d like to introduce you to our first novel suspect, the victim’s husband, Army Staff Sergeant Jace Merrick. It remains to be seen whether Jace is pure evil, but he is definitely a narcissist and a sociopath with no conscience.

He enlisted in the Army during college, after losing is scholarship (it was his professor’s fault, of course), and was infantry, 11-Bravo. He’s a smart guy and has done well. Now his military career is taking a satisfying leap forward with his transfer to Ft. Huachuca, AZ, for Intelligence training.

That is, until his wife, Abby, threatens to report his long-running affair to his commanding officer. Unfortunately, his lover is a female officer, also at the Fort. If he doesn’t break off the fraternization, they could both be court-marshalled. He’s not going to let Abby use his affair against him. In fact, he’s plotting how to get rid of her and make it look like a Cartel human smuggling operation gone wrong.  

In researching sociopaths, one of the things I found interesting is that they see nothing at all wrong with their way of living in the world. Every decision a sociopath makes is based on “how does it affect me.” They are noted for their shallowness of emotion, and the hollow and transient nature of any affectionate feeling they may claim to have carries a certain breathtaking callousness.

They have no trace of empathy and no genuine interest in bonding emotionally with a mate. Once the surface charm is scraped off (and often there is a thick overlying layer of charm—sociopaths are very good at their game), their marriages are loveless, one-sided, and almost always short-term.

As the book evolves, Jace will refuse to acknowledge any blame or even responsibility for the decisions he makes, or for the outcomes of his decisions.   The American Psychiatric Association actually has a term for this, “consistent irresponsibility,” and it’s a cornerstone of the antisocial personality diagnosis.

I thought it would be difficult to write a sociopathic personality, but, as it turns out, I am dealing with one in my real life right now, so it was easy to find examples to pattern the behavior.

There’s a good chance you may have a conscienceless sociopath in your life as well. According to the book, The Sociopath Next Door by Martha Stout, PhD, sociopaths make up about four percent of the population.

Often they are attractive, intelligent and extremely successful. But because they truly have no conscience, self-awareness is impossible, and the rest of us just shake our heads and mutter,”Whaat? How can you possibly think that…act like that…do that to someone?”

If you have a close relationship with a sociopath, with a person who truly has no conscience, all my research says not to put out the effort to try and change him or her. Instead, walk away—and take your loved ones with you.

In the end, just as the sociopath has no genuine relationships with other people, he has only a very tenuous one with himself.

Stop by next time and meet another suspect, Rumor’s brother Alberto. He’s a Cartel coyote and drug smuggler, but much more of a good/bad mix than Jace. I think you’ll like him, and he’ll teach us some about smuggling people and contraband across the Mexican border into the States.
Until then, good reading.

Just like the rest of us, novel characters has wounds in their past, hidden scars they carry with them wherever they go.

Our pasts are filled with experiences, both good and bad, which teach us who to trust, what to believe in, and what to avoid. The painful experiences—the wounds—influence us so deeply that we will do almost anything to avoid feeling such pain again. That past trauma is likely to affect our future behavior as well.
​
As writers, how do we create characters who feel realistic? By mirroring real life as much as possible. That includes developing a backstory for each character that lets us understand him/her on the deepest level. Knowing who and what influences a characters gives us insight to what they fear, desire and need most of all. Sometimes even if the character doesn’t know himself.

Bradley Cooper in American Sniper. He's the image in my head when I visualize my killer (sorry, Bradley). 

Emotional wounds are more than just painful memories. Inside each wound is a seed of doubt. Was it my fault? Could I have prevented the outcome? Was there something else I could have done? It’s human nature to second-guess decisions that result in a bad outcome, to rationalize tragedies, and to try to make sense of them. Many times we blame ourselves for what happened, even when events were out of our control.

Because of this internalization, a lie is born.

When a person is wounded, he wraps himself in emotional armor to keep his feelings safe. Flaws develop, working under the rationalization of protecting himself from getting hurt further. Oftentimes, instead of keeping the person safe, these flaws limit him, preventing him from building healthy relationships, or putting a filter of distrust on all he sees.

Do you know anyone like this?
​
This year I’ve had my novel antagonist under the microscope, examining his backstory “wounds” and focusing all his hurt and pain into a single moment in his past that explains his motivation (and rationalization) to kill. 

​This excerpt from my upcoming novel, Crescent Moon Crossing, shows the killer’s motivation: 

The man in the driver’s seat removed his baseball cap and rubbed his sweaty head with a bandana. He hated this monochrome desert landscape and its searing temperatures. It reminded him of Iraq. Made him feel exposed and twitchy. The glare brought back his blinding headaches, and the nightmares too. The ones that jerked him awake in a cold sweat, reaching for his rifle. 

But he had a job to do.

When Jace came out, the man put down his black coffee and raised binoculars to his eyes.  He watched Jace unlock his metallic blue Mustang. The bastard was whistling as he slid behind the wheel. That smug face, seemingly right in front of him, thanks to the magnified lens, made his breath catch and stomach acid bubble up and burn his throat.

e squeezed the binoculars until his fingers ached. Breathing hard, he imagined his hands around Jace's neck, squeezing, squeezing, until that cocky smile disappeared, replaced by terror.

Chances were Jace wouldn't remember him. He’d lost weight and was dressed as a civilian in a dark ball cap and a Black Sabbath t-shirt. But his old squad leader hadn’t changed a bit. Still slim, buff and full of himself. Still the lady’s man.

He shut his eyes as his nostrils filled with the old-penny scent of blood. The car, the heat, the sleazy motel faded away. Instead, he imagined what those last hours must have been like, while his wife was on the operating table, her belly clamped open, blood filling the cavity faster than the nurses could suction it out. He imagined the tiny body of Baby Emily, still attached, while the surgeon worked frantically to get her out and save her mother. He imagined the still form disappearing, its face submerged in blood.
“No. No. No.” He trembled as terror seared his guts and the flashback engulfed him. His arms, of their own volition, reached out to touch his wife, to help lift his baby daughter’s head above the blood, to clean out her nose and throat and force her to breathe.

The rumbling of Jace’s turbo-charged Mustang brought his thoughts back to the motel. He relaxed his cramped hands from the binoculars and massaged his chest. Just my luck to have a heart attack in this dusty, shit hole parking lot. His face was wet and tears had soaked the neck of his tee shirt. 

Anger boiled away his tears, as he thought about Jace Merrick, the self-involved asshole who made him miss his wife’s delivery. She lost her life and he lost his career. But Jace? Nothing. A night in the stockade for starting a bar fight, that’s all.

Soon after Barb and Em’s death, they told him he’d suffered a psychotic break during a night patrol. He was convinced people were trying to kill him.

“Of course they are, you jackass,” Jace had said. “We’re in the middle of a war zone.” He slapped him on the helmet and sent him back out on patrol the next night.

So he continued his normal duties and buried it all. Or tried to. But who wants a sniper with the shakes? He looked down at his trembling hands in disgust.

“All Sarge’s fault,” he mumbled, cursing his platoon leader in his mind with all the dirty words he could think of. “All your fault.”

He knew he was sick. The over-exposure to violent deaths had infected him like a toxin. His shakes got worse, and his CO noticed. Told him he had no choice but to remove him from active duty.

 He snuck into the CO’s office and read the medical discharge. “His sense of reality is fragile in the extreme,” it read. “For his own sake, and for the safety of his squad mates, he needs rest and in-patient psychiatric care.”

He disagreed. What he really needed was revenge.
 
I think his backstory will help make this killer tragic and relatable, and he’ll also have a redeemable moment at the end of the book.
Thank you for reading!

I just finished taking a writing class with author Simon Wood. Actually, I’ve taken two from him so far, with a third one scheduled in October.

This one was on writing point of view, and the direction he gave was so heartening to me. In the past, I have heard agents say to limit the number of POV characters in your novel.  They suggest no more than two points of view, for example, the male and female leads in a romance novel.

But I can name any number of novels written from the viewpoint of multiple characters.

So I did some more checking. Turns out there are as many opinions as there are plotlines. 

Jane Cleland, in Mastering Suspense Structure and Plot (I highly recommend, by the way), points out the mysteries and suspense often use the multiple perspective structure, allowing both the hero and the villain their say, and sometimes, the victims, too.

​Here’s an example from Robert B. Parker’s Night Passage. You’ll see that each chapter is told from one character’s POV:

• Chapter 1: Jesse Stone, the protagonist
• Chapter 2: Tom Carson, a victim
• Chapter 3: Jesse Stone
• Chapter 4: Hasty Hathaway, the antagonist
• Chapter 5: Jesse Stone
• Chapter 6: Jo-Jo Genest, the villain
• Chapter 7: Jesse Stone
• Chapter 8: Carole Genest, a victim
• Chapter 9: Jesse Stone
• Chapter 10: Jo-Jo Genest
• Chapter 11: Jesse Stone

Night Passage continues to follow this pattern, changing perspective chapter by chapter, with minor characters having their voices dominate fewer chapters than major characters, and no character presented more than Jesse.
 
I’m following a similar pattern with my book, giving POV perspectives of the protagonist (Sheriff Cooper Jones), as well as the female lead (Rumor Vargas) and the three murder suspects. I’m introducing the POVs in an alternating order, with the Sheriff, rotating between the others.
 
Despite the multiple perspectives, the story still follows a chronological structure. This technique allows the reader to observe how various characters think, to witness cause and effect, and to feel the rippling tension of growing suspense as deadly events are set in motion.
 
Before you jump in, though, consider some of the ways the multiple POV tactic can go wrong. 

• Readers may lose interest in your plot if they discover who the villain is before the protagonist figures it out.
• It’s easy to reveal too much, too soon.
• If you switch perspectives too often or too quickly, you may interrupt the narrative flow.

Multiple POV is not for the faint of heart. It’s hard work and requires a lot of planning. Here are a few rules to follow when working with multiple POV:
 
#1.  Make sure you have a good reason to be writing multiple points of view. That reason should come from the story itself. Ask yourself the question: ‘Why does this story need to be told from multiple points of view?’
 
The answer could be that there is more than one ‘main’ character whose perspective is vital to the story, or that the scope of the story or world is large and using only one perspective would be limiting. Two excellent examples for the need for multiple POVs are Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn and My Sister’s Keeper by Jodi Picoult. For very different reasons, too.
 
Decide what’s driving your plot. You have two main options with multiple POVs and plot. One, you can write about a single set of events from different perspectives. Or two, you can use several sets of events that move from place to place and character to character without a lot of overlap.
 
#2. Give each POV character a clear and distinct voice. You must develop each individual voice so that all the perspectives presented are clearly distinct from one another. The livelier and more individual the better. Everything about a character—from their dialogue, speech patterns and actions, to their internal thoughts and motivations—can be used to develop their unique voice as a POV narrator. For fun, try distinguishing each character by using a different dominant sense they use the most.
 
#3. Create complete character arcs for each POV character.  This includes identifying goals, stakes, and pitfalls, and how those move the story forward. THIS, by the way, is usually my motivation for making a character have his/her own POV: They have their own subplot woven into the main story, and that subplot needs a voice.
 
#4. How many POV characters? Unless you are George R.R. Martin (or maybe even if you are), too many POV characters can overwhelm or confuse readers.  Some experts and writing coaches say no more than 3 to 5 POV characters is a safe bet. That way, you can develop each character fully, and tie their subplot story lines together succinctly.
 
#5. First Person vs Third Person. You have three main options when writing a novel from multiple points of view.
 
Option #1 is to use first-person POV for each character. Each character receives its own narrative. But, and a big BUT. If you do this, you must create a distinct voice for each character. As a reader, I should know who’s speaking with blatant clues (i.e. this is Tom speaking). You will need to channel each character when writing in first person, regardless of how many POVs you have. First person is close-up and personal.
 
Option #2 is to use third –person POV for each character. This option is subtle; you can glide from following one character to another. You’re limited to only what that character knows and experiences, but your narrator voice doesn’t need to shift as it does in first person. I still recommend using chapter or scene breaks to switch between characters, to avoid a jarring transition.
 
Option #3 is to use a mix of first and third-person POV. For example, have one main character in first person and shift to third person for supporting characters. Keep in mind, it’s not always easy to transition from first to third and back again throughout the novel. It can feel like whiplash for your reader, especially if your scene breaks aren’t well delineated. I recommend you switch to a different POV at the end of a chapter (not scene).
 
In Harlan Coben’s Gone For Good, all the scenes featuring the protagonist POV are in first person, while all the other POV characters are in third-person for their scene. The first-person narrative brings the reader closer to the protagonist because it’s intimate storytelling, while the third-person narrative perspective keeps the reader at arm’s length from the other characters.
 
#6. Stick to a one-chapter-per-POV approach as much as possible. When you’re writing multiple points of view, you need a way to clearly transition between perspectives. The most common method is shown in the Robert Parker Night Passage example at the beginning of this article. Writing one chapter from one character’s perspective, the next from a different character’s perspective, and so on. A scene break may be more appropriate if the chapter continues in the same moment or includes something where a chapter break might be too harsh a transition. Regardless of the reason, if you do switch POV characters without ending a chapter, there needs to be a clear scene break or marker to distinguish between the two perspectives.
 
When starting a new POV chapter, you must orient your reader as quickly as possible so they know whose perspective they’ve switched to. You can do this by titling each chapter with the POV character’s name, although I am not a fan of this approach. I’d prefer to make it clear, preferably in the first chapter, whose head we are now in.
 
#7. Choose carefully which POV you write each scene from. This may be clear in some parts of your story, but less easy to decide in others. If several of your POV characters are present in the same scene, ask yourself these questions to narrow down your decision:

• Which character has the most at stake in this scene?
• Through which character’s perspective will the scene have the most impact?
• What do I want to convey with this scene, and which character will help me do it best?

Try to avoid retelling the same scene from different perspectives (unless this is a special device you’re using to reveal important new information). Even then, tread lightly. You know, ground hog day stories grate on many readers.
 
#8. Consider choosing one “main” POV character. Here one character receives more screen time (i.e. more POV scenes) than the other POV characters, and his story and character arc is the overall focus of the novel. (See the Jesse Stone example earlier). Simon Wood even gave us a formula in our class, depending on how many POVs you use, but the basic rule of thumb is to give your protagonist roughly half of the POV scenes.
 
#9.  Examine the Action
Take a look at what you know about this story. Where is the plot going to take the characters? What’s going to happen? Which characters are going to be present at the most important events?
With a little ingenuity, it’s amazing how much action you can successfully convey to readers without needing a POV character to be right on there on the scene. But it’s best to examine the overall needs of the story’s plot before choosing POV characters.

#10. Examine the Climactic Moment
With the obvious practical considerations out of the way, take a moment to consider which POVs really matter to your story—on a thematic level.

How do you know? Look at your climatic moment. Which characters are involved in this final confrontation that definitively decides your conflict one way or another? These are (or should be) the characters who are most inherent to the story’s thematic arc. These are the most important characters in your story. These are your best and most obvious choices for POVs that will meaningfully contribute throughout the story.

This does not, of course, mean all the characters present at the climactic moment should be given POVs. But if they’re not present at the Climax, you have to question if they’re really important enough to get POVs earlier in the story. 
 
Knowing other characters’ roles in the climax will also help you determine how their POVs should be structured—or if they should be given a POV at all. The climax is where every piece of your story will prove itself either part of a cohesive whole, or a random, ill-conceived loose end.
 
Knowing how your story’s conflict ends will give you a huge clue into the right choice for just about any POV question you need to resolve.
 
Writer friends, tell me your opinions! Have you written stories with multiple POVs? How do you determine which POVs deserve to be included in your story? Tell me in the comments!
 
Until next week, happy writing!

​ “Your heart is slamming against your rib cage, your fingertips are moist and you turn another page. The antagonist is setting a trap. You wish you could do something to prevent the protagonist from walking into it, but you can’t. You’re helpless, totally at the mercy of the writer. All you can do is turn the page.”

That’s how Simon Wood (The One That Got Away), one of my favorite suspense writers, describes what he’s going for when he writes his novels.

Do you read suspense? Mystery? Or do you prefer thrillers?

First, let’s understand the difference between the three genres.

The key difference between mystery and suspense is perspective. Both genres deal with a crisis event to hook the reader and keep the story going. But the storytelling approach is completely different.

Let’s say the crisis is the assassination of the president of the United States. 
In a mystery, the president would die in the first chapter, and the rest of the book would focus on the government agents finding the killer and bringing him to justice. Mystery is all about the puzzle.

New York Times bestselling author David Morrell (Brotherhood of the Rose and Rambo) says, “One crucial distinction is that traditional mysteries appeal primarily to the mind and emphasize the logical solution to a puzzle.”

Here are some of my favorite mysteries:

Louise Penny - How the Light Gets In (Chief Inspector Armand Gamache series)

Alan Bradley - The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie

Agatha Christie – And Then There Were None


Going back to the president’s assassination example, in a suspense story, instead of the actual assassination in the first chapter, an intercepted communique or a bungled weapons drop would take place, alerting the White House of an imminent threat. This time, the government agents would be charged with protecting the president while tracking down the would-be assassin. The story would climax at the point where the assassination attempt is thwarted.

Suspense creates drama before the crisis event and builds slowly. Tension builds gradually, we’re waiting for the next bad thing to happen, expecting the shoe to drop.

Often, the reader may know the danger is coming before the protagonist, so we go through the agony of waiting.

Suspense also allows the writer some freedoms not afforded the mystery writer. Writers can employ multiple point-of-view characters.

They can present the bad guy and his motivations, giving the reader insight into his character.

​ This allows the writer to actively pit his antagonist and protagonist against each other while the reader watches.

Think about Hannibal Lector, Thomas Harris’s character in Red Dragon and Silence of the Lambs. 

Think about Hannibal Lector, Thomas Harris’s character in Red Dragon and Silence of the Lambs. 

From torturing animals to killing people in gruesome ways and eating them, we come to know his character intimately. This is a villain who sends shivers down your spine. 

In a mystery, the author will never write from the bad guy’s point of view. The writer must purposely keep the bad guy’s identity hidden to maintain the mystery. The puzzle is the important thing for the mystery reader. 

​For the suspense read, it’s all about the mood. Alfred Hitchcock was a master of creating a mood of foreboding in his films

Stephen King often uses mood to foretell that something terrible will happen to his characters. He does this through internal monologue and increasingly difficult situations.

Read The Stand for a classic example of these techniques.

​In one of my favorite suspense novels, Shadow of the Wind (Carlos Ruiz Zafon), the main character is investigating a mysterious book that’s being hunted, leaving shattered lives in its wake.

Or, the suspense can be sheer creepiness.

​Try You by Caroline Kepnes.

You'll never look at dating the same again.

​Occasionally the author manages to create a sense of foreboding as well as challenging the reader with a puzzle. 

In Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, Robert Langdon and Sophie Neveu must solve a cryptex in order to find out why someone may have killed Sophie’s grandfather and is trying to kill them. Time pressure and physical danger play a role as well, but the reader’s prime focus is understanding the riddle. 

The Da Vinci Code also crosses into our third genre with its non-stop action: Thriller.

Where mysteries represent the most cerebral of the three major suspense genres, and suspense builds slowly, thrillers are out-of-control wildfires.  There is usually the threat of some catastrophe affecting whole communities, cities, countries, even the planet. The threat need not be total devastation—but the effect of the action must be profound. And the hero is under constant attack as he or she tries to prove the perpetrator’s guilt and/or stop the next atrocity. 

​Many times the antagonist appears at the beginning, and we know what he’s going to do.
Think of Ian Fleming’s James Bond novels. At the beginning of each story, the reader knows who 007 is up against and what deadly plan he has to stop. Playing with their suspense cards on the table, thrillers create tension by inserting a strong good guy AND a strong antagonist. 

​Thriller plots can go an endless number of directions. The Killing Floor by Lee Child established wandering ex-military investigator Jack Reacher as a force to be reckoned with in the criminal underworld. 

Note: Did you notice that these thriller covers are have a similar look? That is not a coincidence.  Publishers print a lot of thriller covers with big splashes of red (danger!) and bold print. 

Tom Clancy has made himself synonymous with the tech-savvy military thriller.

​ The Hunt for Red October is where it all started and remains one of his best.

In Jurassic Park, Michael Crichton taps his mesmerizing talent and scientific brilliance to bring humankind’s thrilling fantasies to life…until something   goes wrong. 

​And, of course, in thrillers, something is always going to go wrong--with cataclysmic results.

​I personally enjoy mystery, suspense and thrillers. These genres continually find a way to create stories that are fresh, interesting and original. From cozy mysteries to edge-of-your-seat suspense, to high-octane thrillers, there is bound to be something for you.

Next time I'm going to begin telling you about my own in-the-works suspense novel, Crescent Moon Crossing. 
​
Until then, find yourself a new favorite suspense author, and dig in!